Resurrection in the bible essay College paper Academic Service
As seen above, these criteria corroborate- although they donot prove- the historicity of the Resurrection accounts. To argue that theaccounts are complete fabrications, one would have to answer the followingquestions: 1) why do we have five independent accounts of a fictitious event? One could deny these sources are independent and argue that a single, extremelyearly account (prior to ) was elaborated and modified by five differentauthors; however, in no other case do scholars believe there is such a singlesource to which all the evangelists and Paul had access. Why would wehypothesize such a source only in this case? 2) why do all four gospel accountsrecord women discovering the empty tomb? This fact would have been incrediblyembarrassing to the early church. If the accounts were complete fabrications,why did the authors not advance Peter or John as the first witnesses? 3) wheredid the idea of a bodily Resurrection come from? No other crucified Jewishmessianic figure was ever claimed to have been bodily Resurrected. Such aclaim would also have been a major stumbling block to the Greeks that theapostles were trying to evangelize (see the incredulous Athenians response toPaul in quoted at the beginning of this essay). Pagan myths of gods dying andrising in some spiritual realm (to mark the advent of Spring, for instance) werenot equivalent to the bold assertion that a Jew from Nazareth physically rosefrom the dead with nail marks in his hand and ate fish with his disciples. Ifthe Resurrection was invented to attract converts, why invent such animplausible, distasteful story? In my opinion, dismissing the accounts ascomplete fabrications is hard to square with the evidence. Instead, manycritics who reject the Resurrection still believe that the accounts preservecertain historical elements such as the discovery of an empty tomb by women andthe disciples belief that they had seen Jesus.
The Resurrection Of Jesus In The Bible 61773 DFILES
One of the more interesting essays Ive read on the subjectof the Resurrection was written by agnostic , the co-founder and former president of the atheist website . In his essay he talks about how he first encounteredevidence for the Resurrection during a talk by Christian apologist and laterwhile listening to a debate between atheist Frank Zindler and Christian (to whom thisessay is greatly indebted). Ill quote Lowders introduction at some lengthbecause I find it so honest and interesting:
In this essay, I want to discusswhy I think the resurrection is an important historical issue that needs to beaddressed by both Christians skeptics. Next I examine the wholequestion of miracles, and the implications for this debate. Then I want to givebrief overview of popular and scholarly arguments for and against theresurrection, and outline the strengths and weakness of both sides.
Ex libris | Abridged online books
by Jeff Lowder: an excellent essay byagnostic/freethinker Jeff Lowder on the importance of the Resurrection for bothChristiand and atheists. Lowder concludes that the prior probability of Godsexistence is the key factor in determining a persons assessment of thehistoricity of the Resurrection.
The Holy Bible: King James Version. Acts 1
To non-Christians reading this essay, I hope you have beenchallenged by the evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ and motivated toinvestigate further. But I also hope youve seen how many of your conclusionshave a deep root in your basic assumptions about reality. Evidence can onlytake us so far. At some point, we will run up against the faith commitmentsthat we all have, whether Christian or skeptic. That is why, in the end, it isnot the evidence for the Resurrection, but Jesus Christ himself whom you needto consider. Jesus claims to be God himself and to have the right to ourabsolute obedience. Yet Jesus also claims to be our savior, our friend, ourcomforter, and our good shepherd who suffered, wept, and died to bring usrestoration with God. Paradoxically, in serving him we do not find bondage butfreedom: freedom from sin, from fear, and from condemnation. God did providean extraordinary sign in the form of the Resurrection that we might see it andtrust in him, but even more relevantly, he gave us an extraordinary person. Itis the person of Jesus Christ himself that is the ultimate argument for God;his character as revealed in Scripture is the ultimate miracle; and He Himselfis the only sure foundation on which to build our lives.
Resurrection Butterflies « Mustard Seed Faith
: the transcript of a debate on the historicity of theResurrection between Christian apologist William Lane Craig and agnostic Biblescholar Bart Ehrman. This essay relies heavily on the framework that Craiguses in all of his debates as well as his application of Bayes theorem. Themain differences are that his presentation is far more elegant and that he isfar, far more knowledgeable than I am. Transcripts and recordings of Craigsdebates can be found online and I highly recommend them.
Behold, the Lamb of God 5-Week Lenten Bible Study …
Where does that leave us? After reading Jeff Lowders excellentessay, I e-mailed him a question that his essay seemed to leave unanswered: Iasked him how someone can change their worldview. If, as he says, ourpresuppositions determine our acceptance or rejection of the Resurrection, howdoes one ever change ones mind? How is it possible to question onesassumptions if they are truly foundational?