January 16, 1919. Repealed by the Twenty-First, December 5, 1933.
Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Trump Supporters Now Have Their Own Dating Website
Massachusetts, through the pen of John Hancock, offered a proposal that would have prohibited Congress from levying direct taxes ... As a check on the national government, Massachusetts wanted the states to retain some control on Congresss demands for revenue.Massachusetts also proposed an amendment dealing with concerns about inadequate representation.
Section 3. If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President elect shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.
It's the guiding philosophy of liberty.
Incidents where the victim was found not guilty of shooting a cop, or a few cops, like this story posted by Deckard, but the home invader officer perps weren't prosecuted...
The heart & soul of the BOR and the USA.
-- This means you have the God-given right to do whatever you want, but if that right is not protected by a constitution the majority (acting through their elected representatives) may regulate or even prohibit that activity.
It does NOT say those rights are protected.
This zone may millions, but it doesn't infringe the rights of millions.Within 25-75 miles of our southern border, for example, the Border Patrol operates 71 traffic checkpoints, including 33 permanent traffic checkpoints, along major U.S.
Any other rights you'd like to see "modified"?
The case I cited was to demonstrate the balance between the interests of the Government and the privacy right of the individual -- to show I wasn't "channeling Spock".
Where did you dig up that cockamamie BS?
How about "the entire population of SEVERAL of the states" then?Would that make you understand the fact that this 100 mile border zone bullshit is infringing upon the rights of MILLIONS of people within those states?
Where would that be, pray tell?
I guess you ignored the map.All of Florida, Delaware, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Most of Connecticut, all of Michigan, most of New York and Pennsylvania.Whatever you say Hillary.
The entire population of how many states?
FAKE NEWS!!The Border Patrol requires "reasonable suspicion" of an immigration violation (or crime) in order to conduct a search within 100 miles of the United States international border.